Legal Opinion

Junior William Benefield and Amos Bailous Benefield v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1966No. 22812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

Appellants were convicted of a conspiracy to violate the Internal Revenue Laws relating to distilled liquors. Each appellant also was convicted of several substantive counts arising under said laws. The convictions are appealed on three grounds. We affirm.

As to sufficiency of the evidence against defendant Amos Benefield: an Alcohol Tax Unit agent testified he observed Amos put several sacks of sugar into one of the stills. This, together with his presence at the still, was sufficient to support a verdict of guilty on the charge of making mash fit for distillation, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Barenblatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Frank Sepulveda Casados v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Fuller Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  2. United States v. Sherman Vernon Lyles, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. SinkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Scott v. Alabama State Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API