Legal Opinion

Fuller Holt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1961No. 18510PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from convictions for conspiracy and various substantive counts of “moonshining”.

Appellants’ principal contention is that the participation of a paid government informer in their illegal activities estops the government from prosecuting them. The record clearly establishes that the government agent did not seduce otherwise innocent persons to violate the law. See Park v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 283 F.2d 253. Rather, the informants’ participation in their illegal activities was at the behest of the defendants in each instance. What the government paid for, and what it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barenblatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Andrew Clifford Park and John W. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. John Benson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Elzy Marvin Sigers, Billy Burnsed, Henry James Connor, Paul Crews and Roy Lee Gilchrist and Marvin Leroy Curry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Loy Dean Sheffield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Junior William Benefield and Amos Bailous Benefield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. Nathaniel Parker, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API