Legal Opinion
Nichols v. First Union National Bank
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 17, 2006No. 04-CV-1576PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
The claims in this appeal arise out of disputed financial transactions between appellant, Timothy Nichols, and First Union National Bank and its employee, Michael D. Lang. 1 We see no reason to disturb the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, or its denial of appellant’s “motion for reconsideration,” which we deem to be a Superior Court Civil Rule 60 motion. We reverse, however, the trial court’s erroneous grant of costs to First Union, the party that prevailed in the litigation, under Superior Court Civil Rule 68.
I
The parties agree that appellant signed a promissory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Joeckel v. Disabled American VeteransDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Tunison v. Continental Airlines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Vincent v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bolton v. Bernabei & Katz, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re OrshanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Bansda v. WheelerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Recio v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.