Legal Opinion

Joeckel v. Disabled American Veterans

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2002No. 99-CV-1212, 99-CV-910PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Charles Joeckel, Jr. appeals from an order of the Superior Court which granted summary judgment against him and in favor of Disabled American Veterans (DAV) on Joeckel’s complaint which alleged that DAV had “unlawfully, willfully, maliciously and without probable cause” brought a civil action against him in the state of Kentucky. Because Joeckel has not alleged that he has suffered the “special injury” required under the current state of our law to maintain such a suit, we affirm. 1

I

FACTUAL SUMMARY

Appellant served as National Adjutant of DAV from 1988 to 1993, having…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Carl v. Children's HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Morowitz v. MarvelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Bown v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Christopher G. Pitt, Sr. And Tela Hansom-Pitt v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  2. Dormu v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. District of Columbia v. TulinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API