Midville, Swainsboro, & Red Bluff Railroad v. Bruhl
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Evans. Emanuel superior court. January 15, 1902.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
Bruhl sued the Midville, Swainsboro, and Red Bluff Railroad Company and John C. Coleman for damages. The judge directed a verdict against the railroad company, and the jury found *330in favor of Ooleman. The railroad company excepts to the.overruling of its motion for a new trial.
1. When the case was here before (Bruhl v. Coleman, 113 Ga. 1102), it was held that if the railroad company was the agent of ■Coleman, both he and the company were liable to the plaintiff. We do not deem it necessary to again set out in full the facts of this very remarkable transaction, which in one form and another has…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schley v. LyonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
- Newton v. SummeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Southern Express Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Bruhl v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mashburn & Co. v. Dannenberg Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MoteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Beaver v. MagidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Trussell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Stapleton v. DismukesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.