Legal Opinion

United States v. Robinson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1997No. 96-11165PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

The principal issues in this direct criminal appeal are whether the Hobbs Act is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce; and if so, whether the Act is constitutional as applied to a defendant whose conduct, viewed in isolation, does not substantially affect interstate commerce.

The Hobbs Act makes it a federal offense to impede interstate commerce through robbery or extortion. The appellant, relying on United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), contends that the Act is unconstitutional because it…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. United States v. UrbanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  2. Groome Resources Ltd, Llc, United States of America, Intervenor v. Parish of JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Derrick Thomas and Jason A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API