Legal Opinion

United States v. Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2000No. 99-10162PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence below and attacks the constitutionality of the federal “three strikes” sentencing provision. For the reasons assigned, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Because this case involves multiple robberies committed during a two-month robbery spree, we briefly summarize the facts surrounding the robberies.

I. Robbery Spree

A. Ramada Inn incident

On November 25, 1997, two men approached a clerk at a Ramada Inn Limited Motel located in Mesquite, Texas. The two men asked about room vacancies and rates, and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. Vernon Snype, Marisa HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. K.P. v. LeBlancCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Richard Allen WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API