Legal Opinion
Paull v. Radlo
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 25, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries received on March 10, 1932, while in the employ of the defendant, who was not a subscriber under the workmen’s compensation act. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152. At the time of the alleged injuries the plaintiff was a saleswoman in the defendant’s store. She testified that her injuries were the result of slipping and falling on the floor which was covered with linoleum and had been oiled.
The plaintiff called as a witness one Whiting who testified that he was a janitor for the George Robert White Fund, the owner of the building in which the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Smith v. Import Drug Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Blake v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Zerngis v. H. P. Hood & SonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fanciullo v. B. G. & S. Theatre Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Ventromile v. Malden Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Kay v. AudetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Puro v. HeikkinenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Hutchins v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.