Legal Opinion

Blake v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

Upon the conflicting testimony in this case it was possible for a jury to find that the plaintiff slipped and fell in the defendant’s store upon a floor made slippery by moisture over a considerable surface which had become saturated with oil through the application of a thick floor oil during many months of the year. Moisture was brought into the store upon the feet, clothing and umbrellas of customers who came in during a rainy day from a somewhat slushy street. The store was otherwise clean and well lighted and there was evidence to justify a finding that the plaintiff was in the exercise…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Brockton Public Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Judson v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Mascary v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. O'Leary v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Blease v. WebberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. McVeigh v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
  2. Heina v. Broadway Fruit Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Lyle v. MegerleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Ventromile v. Malden Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API