Blake v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
Upon the conflicting testimony in this case it was possible for a jury to find that the plaintiff slipped and fell in the defendant’s store upon a floor made slippery by moisture over a considerable surface which had become saturated with oil through the application of a thick floor oil during many months of the year. Moisture was brought into the store upon the feet, clothing and umbrellas of customers who came in during a rainy day from a somewhat slushy street. The store was otherwise clean and well lighted and there was evidence to justify a finding that the plaintiff was in the exercise…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rankin v. Brockton Public Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Judson v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Mascary v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- O'Leary v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Blease v. WebberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McVeigh v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
- Heina v. Broadway Fruit Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lyle v. MegerleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Ventromile v. Malden Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.