Legal Opinion
Puro v. Heikkinen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 1, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.
The plaintiff David Puro, his wife, the plaintiff Wilhelmina Puro, and his daughter, the plaintiff Irene Puro, were riding in an automobile operated by the defendant, who was accompanied by his wife and daughter, on the morning of August 20, 1939, on their way from Fitchburg to Cape Cod for the purpose of spending four days in a camp, when the automobile overturned. The plaintiffs had verdicts on the counts of their declarations alleging that their injuries were due to the negligence of the defendant. They excepted to the action of the judge who on leave reserved ordered the entry of verdicts…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Santa Maria v. TrottoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Capano v. MelchionnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Flynn v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Richmond v. Warren Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Payne v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Falvey v. HamelburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Phelps v. Shawprint, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Rappe v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Zarski v. CreamerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Rolfe v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.