Smith v. Import Drug Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
' This is an action for breach of a contract to sell and deliver naphthaline flakes. The declaration was in three counts. The first count may be dismissed without discussion,- as the trial judge ruled that there could be ho recovery upon it. The second and third counts alléged that on or about. February 24, 1920, the defendant agreed to sell *371to the plaintiff and the plaintiff agreed to buy “one car of Prime White Naphthaline Flakes, White Tar Brand, 79 melting point, at 7cents per pound, F.O.B. New York, net ten days, for delivery in March 1920, said car to contain between 150-200 barrels”;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doherty v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Fred T. Ley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Dolphin v. PlumleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Puffer Manufacturing Co. v. YeagerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
3Cited by26 opinions
- Liggett Drug Co. v. License CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Gregory v. Maine Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Caruso v. ShelitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Halnan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- People's Savings Bank v. ChesleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.