Legal Opinion

Trecy v. Jefts

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 10, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action to recover money paid by mistake. The verdict was for the plaintiffs. There was evidence tending to show the following facts. The plaintiffs were in trouble, and many of their creditors had signed a paper giving time, with an option to settle for fifty per cent. The plaintiffs owed the defendant $1,014.80, but by a mistake supposed that they owed $2,029.60, twice as much. The defendant knew the mistake, but did not mention it to the plaintiffs. The defendant signed the paper by an agent, and the plaintiffs, purporting and intending to pay one half of their debt, as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Landrum v. Trowbridge, Dwight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Hunt v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Commonwealth v. DonahueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Farrington v. HodgdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. MelesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Bruce v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Emerson v. GerberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. PaigeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Forbes v. AppleyardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API