Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Brown

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1888PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The plaintiff made three notes to Russell, the defendant’s intestate. Afterwards, according to the plaintiff’s evidence in the present case, Russell promised that, if the plaintiff would assent to a compromise, by the executors of the plaintiff’s father’s will, of a claim in their hands against third persons, by which compromise the plaintiff's share of his father’s estate would be diminished, Russell would accept in full settlement of the balance due upon the notes whatever percentage the executors should take in settlement of their claim. The executors then settled the claim for sixty-two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grinnell v. SpinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Star Glass Co. v. MoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Bragg v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Cobb v. CurtissNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  5. Ulsch v. MullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peters v. WallachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Savage v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Segal v. Allied Mutuals Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Sherman v. SidmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API