Legal Opinion
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Paige
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 1, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This action of contract was brought in a district court to recover money paid by the plaintiff’s assignor, Elmer H. Bright and Company, to the defendant. The declaration is in two counts, the second count having been added by motion allowed at the trial at the close of the evidence and amended by motion allowed by the Appellate Division. The trial judge denied certain so called requests for rulings made by the defendant and made certain so called rulings requested by the plaintiff, made special findings of fact and found for the plaintiff. There was a report to the Appellate Division which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woodman v. HaynesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kellogg v. TompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Pacheco v. MedeirosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Montgomery Door & Sash Co. v. Atlantic Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Howard v. Malden Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Piea Realty Co. Inc. v. PapuzynskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Allen v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- E. F. Hutton & Co. v. NourseMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.