Legal Opinion

Diamond T. Motor Car Co. v. Patterson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1929No. Appeal 37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

At the time the attachment execution in this case was served on the garnishee it owed the defendant $110.25, which was due him for hauling gravel with his truck. The question involved in this appeal is whether this money was exempt from attachment, under sec tion 5 of the Act of April 15, 1845, P. L. 459, providing: “That the wages of any laborers, or the salary of any person in public or private employment, shall not be liable to attachment in the hands of the employer.”

The defendant was not a contractor employing other men. He drove his own truck, hauling gravel for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. BrookeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  2. Martin v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  4. Heebner v. ChaveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  5. Seiders's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Integrity Trust Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Ellis Building & Loan Ass'n v. Gross, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API