Legal Opinion

Korynta v. Korynta

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2006No. 20050201PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Cameron Korynta appeals from a trial court’s order denying his motion for new trial or for reconsideration and order for amended judgment nunc pro tunc. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I

[¶ 2] Cameron and Kim Korynta were married in November 1995. At the time, Kim had a daughter from a previous marriage. Cameron adopted this daughter in 1997. During the marriage, the couple had four additional children.

[¶ 3] Kim filed for a divorce on November 14, 2003. A temporary order was entered on February 11, 2004, following cross motions for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brandner v. BrandnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. N.C.C. v. C.S.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Logan v. BushNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Schneider v. SchaafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Lynnes v. LynnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Berge v. BergeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State Ex Rel. K.B. v. BauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API