Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Goldsworthy

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1913No. Crim. No. 227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The petitioner was convicted by a jury in the superior court of Sacramento County of the crime of contributing to the dependency of one Beulah Willard, a minor female child, under the age of twenty-one years, and was thereupon sentenced by said court to an imprisonment of one year in the county jail of said county.

He contends that the information upon which he was prosecuted and convicted wholly fails to state a public offense or any crime known to the law, that the judgment of imprisonment imposed upon him is, therefore, absolutely void, and he in consequence entitled to his release from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex parte KearnyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Matter of RuefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Ex Parte GreenallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. PierroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Ex Parte BoyntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. In Re GarbariniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. In Re MarmadukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API