People v. Pierro
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. R. Guy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Defendant was prosecuted under the provisions of the juvenile court law of 1909 for having committed acts of a lewd and lascivious character with an alleged dependent child named Valita Rhinehart. Otherwise expressed, the offense of contributing to the dependency of a minor under the age of eighteen years was the crime intended to be charged by the information. The appeal is taken from a judgment of imprisonment, and from an order made by the trial court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The act of the legislature referred to defines a dependent child to be one who is found…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. AddcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Gunyon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. PerfettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. CruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Sanderson v. New York Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946
- Jackson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Longsine v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.