Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Boynton

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1905No. 119PublishedCited by 3 opinions

HABEAS CORPUS to test the validity of a. justice’s sentence for misdemeanor in the town of Suisun City, Solano County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.

The petitioner comes before this court on a writ of habeas corpus. He was arrested in the town of Suisun City on a warrant for disturbing the peace. He was brought before the justice of the peace and pleaded guilty, and on the ninth day of June, 1905, was sentenced to sixty days’ imprisonment in the county jail of Solano County., Petitioner claims the complaint on which he pleaded guilty charges no public offense. The charging part of said complaint is as follows:—

“Did willfully and unlawfully and maliciously disturb the peace and quiet of said Chas. H. Downing, on Solano and Main streets in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Ex Parte UpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Matter of Application of GoldsworthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API