Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1963No. Civ. 27657PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the lower court to hear petitioner’s motion for child support and attorney’s fees during the pendency of an action brought by petitioner against her former husband, Paul Winchell, real party in interest.

On March 8, 1963, the original complaint in the action was filed. It contained two counts based on an alleged written property settlement agreement under the terms of which Winchell was to pay, among other specified amounts, for the support of two minor children of the parties. The first count sought declaratory relief in respect to certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krog v. KrogCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Newhall v. NewhallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Walker v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Kresteller v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Parscal v. ParscalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API