Parscal v. Parscal
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether an employer’s mandatory contributions, based upon an employee’s hours of work under a collective bargaining agreement, to an employee welfare fund with spendthrift trust provisions are subject to execution under a judgment against the employee for unpaid court-ordered child support.
The following factual-procedural context of the case is uncontroverted.
Painting contractor employers were required under a collective bargaining agreement to pay $4.50 for each hour worked by a union journeyman employee, to appellant Bay…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cartledge v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- McColgan v. Magee, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1916
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. HeustisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- LaMoure v. LaMoureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011