Legal Opinion

Parscal v. Parscal

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1983No. Civ. 52437PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether an employer’s mandatory contributions, based upon an employee’s hours of work under a collective bargaining agreement, to an employee welfare fund with spendthrift trust provisions are subject to execution under a judgment against the employee for unpaid court-ordered child support.

The following factual-procedural context of the case is uncontroverted.

Painting contractor employers were required under a collective bargaining agreement to pay $4.50 for each hour worked by a union journeyman employee, to appellant Bay…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cartledge v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  2. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Canfield v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. McColgan v. Magee, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. HeustisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LaMoure v. LaMoureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API