Legal Opinion

Walter Laev Used Cars, Inc. v. Olkowski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

When the purchaser of goods becomes dissatisfied with his purchase, there are a number of remedies available to him. The buyer may seek relief either under the contract or by disaffirming it. Among the types of action which may be maintained are those for rescission or fraud. Various remedies available to the purchaser were considered in Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 361, 368, 285 N. W. 794.

In the instant case, upon deciding that the automobile was not as it had been represented, the buyer returned the vehicle to the seller and caused payment on the checks to be stopped. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Hatten v. MonstedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Herman v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  4. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Town of LuverneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Tillmann v. FlierlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seventeen Seventy-Six Peachtree Corp. v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Production Credit Ass'n v. VodakCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API