Tillmann v. Flierl
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed June 21, 1937:
Rosenberry, C. J.
The appellants assign as error the striking from the inventory and accounts the two notes executed by Andrew J. Flierl and Barbara Flierl, his wife, in the sums of $600 and $754.63, respectively. The question for decision here is, Does the evidence offered and received upon the hearing sustain the finding of the trial court that the two notes were given without consideration ? In its decision, the trial court said:
“The testimony offered by the estate for the purpose of proving consideration is not credible in view of the other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- De Fyn v. PowerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Estate of GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Cameron v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Estate of Weiss v. First National Bank of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Evans v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Hatten v. MonstedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Jewell v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- First National Bank v. EckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Estate of RasmussenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Walter Laev Used Cars, Inc. v. OlkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964