Legal Opinion

Tillmann v. Flierl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 21, 1937:

Rosenberry, C. J.

The appellants assign as error the striking from the inventory and accounts the two notes executed by Andrew J. Flierl and Barbara Flierl, his wife, in the sums of $600 and $754.63, respectively. The question for decision here is, Does the evidence offered and received upon the hearing sustain the finding of the trial court that the two notes were given without consideration ? In its decision, the trial court said:

“The testimony offered by the estate for the purpose of proving consideration is not credible in view of the other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. De Fyn v. PowerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Estate of GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Cameron v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Estate of Weiss v. First National Bank of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Evans v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Hatten v. MonstedWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Jewell v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. First National Bank v. EckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Estate of RasmussenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Walter Laev Used Cars, Inc. v. OlkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API