Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Securities Commission v. Continental Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Justice.

This is an action in equity instituted by the Pennsylvania Securities Commission [Commission] against the Continental Manufacturing Company, a Pennsylvania corporation [Continental], the corporate officers and certain of its employees seeking to enjoin the defendants from selling “unregistered securities” in violation of the Pennsylvania Securities Act of 1941 (Act of July 10, 1941, P.L. 317, § 1 et seq., formerly 70 P.S. § 31 et seq.) and the Pennsylvania Securities Act of 1972, P.L. 1280, No. 284, § 101 et seq., 70 P.S. § 1-101 et seq.

Inter alia, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,031 Securities and Exchange Commission v. First American Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. Tate v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Community Sports, Inc. v. Denver Ringsby Rockets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Marks v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cedarbrook Realty, Inc. v. NahillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Port Authority v. Division 85, Amalgamated Transit UnionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. North Penn Gas Co. v. MahoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Buttonwood Farms, Inc. v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API