Ulmer Park Realty Co. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
Plaintiff is the owner of about twenty-three acres of vacant waterfront land in the Gravesend section of Brooklyn. Under the present New York City Zoning Resolution, the greater part of plaintiff’s land has been placed in a residence district and the remainder in a business district; consequently, plaintiff, in the use of its land, is limited to the uses permitted in such districts.
Claiming that the Zoning Resolution in its application to plaintiff’s property is confiscatory in that it deprives plaintiff of the beneficial use thereof, that the Resolution does not bear any substantial relation…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Golden v. Planning Board of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Nappi v. La GuardiaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Scarsdale Supply Co. v. Village of ScarsdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Southern Dutchess Country Club v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.