Legal Opinion

Harry v. Ring the Alarm, LLC

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 25, 2019No. B286084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

*751INTRODUCTION

Appellant Edward Harry worked as a site representative during an event at a *474noted architectural residence owned by respondent James Goldstein. While giving a tour during the event, Harry fell from a platform suspended over a hillside, sustaining serious injuries. Harry sued Goldstein and Ring the Alarm, LLC, the entity that hired him and hosted the party.

Harry's claims against Goldstein for negligence and premises liability proceeded to trial. At the close of evidence, Goldstein asserted a defense under the "firefighter's rule," a subset of the doctrine of primary assumption of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gordon v. ARC Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API