Legal Opinion
In Re Pullings
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1999No. 98-BG-1192PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board , on Professional Responsibility (“Board”), in accord with the Hearing Committee, has found that respondent, Retna M. Pullings, violated several Rules of Professional Conduct in the course of her representation of three different clients. 1 The Board also found that respondent violated D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3), by failing to respond to and comply with two Board orders.
As discipline for these violations, the Board recommends that respondent be suspended for sixty days, that the suspension be stayed, and that respondent be placed on one year of probation subject to conditions. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re DunietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re TinsleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re SamadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re BoykinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.