Commonwealth v. Martinez
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
Appellant, Efrain Martinez, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed after his conviction for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. 1 Appellant claims that the trial court erred in permitting the Commonwealth’s introduction, in its case in chief, of evidence of appellant’s subsequent criminal activity. 2 We agree and, therefore, grant appellant a new trial.
The following facts were adduced at trial. At approximately 7:20 p.m. on May 1, 1978, Officer Joel Hicks and an informant, Stephanie Lynch, entered DiNunzio’s Spaghetti House in Lebanon, Lebanon County. Shortly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commonwealth v. GroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. FaisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. RomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. SparksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HollomanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. CampersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.