Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Martinez

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1982No. 1895PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

Appellant, Efrain Martinez, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed after his conviction for unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. 1 Appellant claims that the trial court erred in permitting the Commonwealth’s introduction, in its case in chief, of evidence of appellant’s subsequent criminal activity. 2 We agree and, therefore, grant appellant a new trial.

The following facts were adduced at trial. At approximately 7:20 p.m. on May 1, 1978, Officer Joel Hicks and an informant, Stephanie Lynch, entered DiNunzio’s Spaghetti House in Lebanon, Lebanon County. Shortly…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Commonwealth v. GroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. FaisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth v. RomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. SparksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. HollomanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. CampersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API