Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Camperson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1992No. 1992PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Stephen Camperson was charged with drug related offenses based upon contraband seized from his home pursuant to warrant on December 7, 1989. Probable cause for the warrant had been obtained via criminal conduct in which Camperson had engaged earlier on the same day. The trial court, in response to a defense motion in limine, barred testimony of Camperson’s earlier criminal conduct during the Commonwealth’s case in chief against Camperson in the trial for drugs found in his home. The Commonwealth, certifying that the trial court’s order substantially handicapped its prosecution…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. LarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. BillaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KinardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. CampersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. McCallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Com. v. Benton, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Bidwell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API