Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 29, 1976No. 146PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

EAGEN, Justice.

The appellant, Gary Roman, was convicted by a jury of murder in the second degree. 1 Following the denial of a motion in arrest of judgment and a motion for a new trial, a prison sentence was imposed. This appeal followed.

The prosecution emanated from the killing of one Mark Chancellor on a farm located in a rural section of Mercer County on which John Gilkey, his wife Mary and their six children resided.

To connect Roman with Chancellor’s killing, the Commonwealth relied mainly on the testimony of Mary Gilkey, which may be summarized in this manner.

Prior to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Commonwealth v. BurdellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth v. RaymondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. GroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. GoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. HilbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API