Legal Opinion

Potter v. City of New Whatcom

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1899No. 3070PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.—Hon. Hibam E. Hadley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Reavis, J.

Action on warrants drawn against a street improvement fund assessment district in the city of Hew Whatcom. The city of Hew Whatcom had entered into a contract for improving streets, and, in discharge of the contracts with the contractors, delivered warrants. drawn payable out of street improvement funds for the assessment districts in which the improvement was done. These warrants were assigned to the respondent. The city answered and pleaded (1) the statute of limitation of two years, and (2) that of three years, and set forth that the city…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. GelbachWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Quaker City National Bank v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State Ex Rel. Clark v. BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API