Legal Opinion
Hancock v. Myers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 23, 1946No. 32227PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
The parties to this appeal will be referred to as . they appeared in the trial .cou-rt, wherein Elizabeth Myers, Viola Phillips Morris, and' K. C. Morris were plaintiffs, and R. L. Hancock and Ruby May Hancock were defendants.
Plaintiffs Elizabeth Myers and Viola Phillips Morris, then ■ Viola Phillips, were owners of the entire estate in one tract and a part of the estate in another adjoining five-acre tract of land which together formed the ten-acre tract involved in this controversy.
The lands had been sold for delinquent taxes and plaintiffs stood the risk of losing their title thereto…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Owens v. PurdySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Nissen v. AndresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Felt v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Alexander Drug Co. v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shamblin v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District Ex Rel. Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Commercial Bank & Trust Co. v. District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District Ex Rel. Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Death of Lofton v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Death of Lofton v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995