Legal Opinion

Alexander Drug Co. v. Whitaker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1930No. 19726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The parties appear in this cause in the same order in which they appeared in the trial court, and they will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiff and defendants.

Plaintiff instituted the suit to recover on seven promissory notes aggregating the sum of $350, with interest and attorney’s fees. The defendant Whitaker filed an amended answer in which he denied generally the allegations of plaintiff’s petition, and then alleged, in substance, that the notes sued on were given as part payment for a refrigerating plant sold by the plaintiff to the defendants. He alleged that the plaintiff made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Maly v. LamertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Hart Grocery Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Hancock v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Knox v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Mul-Berry Oil Co. v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API