Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nelson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Box Elder County. — Hon. O. H. Hart, Judge. Action by A. E. C. Smith against L. P. C. Nelson and others. Erom a judgment taxing costs in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBaetch, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages of the defendants for herding and pasturing sheep upon his premises without his consent It appears, at the commencement of the trial, on September 24, 1900, the defendants, under section 3211, Bevised Statutes, offered, in writing, to allow judgment to be taken against them for a certain sum and for accrued costs, in full satisfaction of plaintiff’s claim. This offer was accepted in open court, and thereupon judgment was directed to he entered against them accordingly. The appellants now complain of the action of the court in taxing costs,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jeffery v. HurshMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McHugh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Willink v. ReceleNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  4. Flores v. ThornTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Robison v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stallo v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Perrin v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Dignan v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Kamas Securities Co. v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Patrick v. Ilwaco Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API