Legal Opinion
Hastorf-Nettles, Inc. v. Pillsbury
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 16, 1953No. 13286PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
Appellants, Hastorf-Nettles, Inc., and United Pacific Insurance Company, its insurance carrier, as complainants in the court below, sought an injunction against appellees whom they made defendants in the district court, to restrain the enforcement and effectiveness of a compensation order and award against them in favor of Cecil Vogel, a claimant, made by'Deputy' Commissioner Warren H. Pillsbury of the United States Compensation Commission, in the course of official duty pursuant to provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act of March 4, 1927, 33…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Liberty Mut. Ins. v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by17 opinions
- O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- William M. O'keeffe, Deputy Commissioner, United States Department of Labor v. Pan American World Airways. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Anderson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Self v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Holland America Insurance Company v. RogersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.