Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1972No. 1494PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

An employee at a remote site suffered injuries during the period when he was off his regular shift but was subject to call at any time. The question on appeal is whether the injuries are compensable under the Alaska system of workmen’s compensation.

Richard Anderson was employed by Universal Services, Inc., as an electrician-lineman on Amchitka Island in the Aleutians, admittedly a remote site. Anderson lived on the employer’s premises, and was provided with food and lodging by the employer. The employer also provided a bartender and a liquor license for the “Rat Roost”…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Oceanview Homeowners Ass'n v. Quadrant Construction & EngineeringAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. GomesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hewing v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. M-K Rivers v. SchleifmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API