Legal Opinion
Levi Family Partnership v. City of Los Angeles CA2/4
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 2015No. B257764UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.
After the South Valley Area Planning Commission (Commission) declined to approve an eldercare facility proposed by appellant Levi Family Partnership, L.P, appellant sought administrative mandamus against respondent City of Los Angeles (City). In denying mandamus, the trial court concluded that the Commission’s findings were adequate to support its decision. We affirm the judgment entered by the court.
RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 14.3.1
The principal issues concern the application of Los Angeles Municipal Code section 14.3.1,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sierra Club v. State Board of ForestryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Rural Landowners Assn. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Tustin Heights Assn. v. BD. OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Young v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Kutzke v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Lafayette Bollinger Development v. Town of MoragaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023