Legal Opinion
Kutzke v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 2017No. D070288PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McConnell, p. j.—
i
INTRODUCTION
Carolyn Kutzke and Karen Kapp (owners) applied to the City of San Diego (City) for a vesting tentative parcel map and related permits to allow them to subdivide two adjacent lots totaling 1.45 acres (property) into four lots, retain an existing residence on one lot, and build a new residence on each of the remaining lots (project).
The local community planning board recommended denial of the project; however, the planning commission approved it and certified a mitigated negative declaration for it. A citizen appealed the planning commission’s decision to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Toigo v. Town of RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Doe v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Saad v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Breneric Associates v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Harris v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Way v. City of Redwood City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Nathu v. City Of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Save Laurel Way v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Save Laurel Way v. City of Redwood CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017