Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Stroud

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1927No. 575PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStanford, J.

This suit was filed by appellant against appellee to recover $1,848.12, being the alleged contract price of 15,401 M •cubic feet of natural gas sold and delivered by appellant to appellee continuously over a period, of 14 months from November, 1925, to; January 1, 1927. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment ren-' dered for appellee. The trial court filed no findings of fact or conclusions, but there is a statement of facts in the record. Appellant, duly perfected its appeal, and presents the ■record here for review.

Under its first proposition, appellant contends, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Walls v. Midland Carbon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Pittsburg-Columbia Oil & Gas Co. v. BroylesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Portland Gasoline Co. v. Superior Marketing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Minnie E. Haby, Joined Pro Forma by Her Husband, Homer H. Haby v. Stanolind Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. E & L Chipping Co. v. Hanover Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1998
  5. City of El Campo v. South Texas Nat. Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API