Legal Opinion

United States v. Lesher

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1932No. 6795PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KETEBEB, District Judge.

Reversal is sought of judgment on a verdict for plaintiff on an $8,000’ war risk insurance policy claim. It is alleged that the insured became totally and permanently disabled prior to March 31, 1919, by reason of encephalitis lethargua residusu The sole is*54sue is alleged ¡error in overruling defendant’s motion for a directed, verdict.

Under the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution, a jury trial is guaranteed in a civil action; and that it is error to direct a verdict for defendant if there is any substantial evidence is stare decisis.

Tho testimony shows that plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rose Wong and Kent Wong v. Walter Swier and Laura SwierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. Vilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. FlippenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. SuomyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API