Legal Opinion

United States v. Suomy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1934No. 7172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRE CHT, Circuit Judge:

Action upon a policy of'war risk insurance instituted by John Helmer Suomy against the United States. 'Verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiff and the government appeals. This appeal is based upon denial by the trial court of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and the question before us is whether or not there was substantial evidence of the total and permanent disability of plaintiff on April 19, 1919', to entitle the ease to go to the jury.

John Helmer'Suomy, a native of Finland, possessing but a limited education, entered the war forces of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Lumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Asher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. HartleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Sprow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. BemisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. United States v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API