Legal Opinion

Vilson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 28, 1932No. 6828PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

To reverse conviction on three counts, (a) unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, (b) unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquors, (e) unlawful possession of a still and equipment designed for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors, this appeal is prosecuted. The issue is presented on denial of a motion for directed verdict.

In consideration of the evidence on a motion for a directed verdict, the evidence-must be considered in its most favorable aspect to the appellee. United States v. Scarborough (C. C. A.) 57 F.(2d) 137; Knable v. United States (C. C. A.) 9…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Tuckerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  4. Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Montana Tonopah Mining Co. v. DunlapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. United States v. ChiarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. United States v. Food and Grocery Bureau of Southern California, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  4. United States v. San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
  5. Cossack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API