United States v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
Prom a judgment after alleged erroneous denial of a motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a verdict, appellant appeals.
The appellee was enlisted in the army in September, 1917, and thereafter received a $10,000 war-risk insurance policy and was *652discharged on the 4th day of April, 1919, claiming total and permanent disability prior thereto. No premiums were paid on the policy after discharge.
The burden of proof was upon the appellee to show by a fair preponderance of the evidence that he was thus totally and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Milford Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Corrigan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Cockrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. ZiegenfussCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Luke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.