Public Schools v. Walker
Supreme Court of the United States
This case was argued at an earlier part of the term; and the court, after advisement, having announced its judgment of affirmance,† Messrs. Blair and Dick, for the plaintiffs in error, now submitted, without oral argument, a printed brief, asking for rehearing and setting forth certain points of the case, including a fundamental fact, on which a? they conceived, the court had fallen into misapprehension. Having taken time to examine the brief,
1Opinion of the Court
The CHIEF JUSTICE
now delivered' the opinion of the court.
No member of the court who concurred in the judgment desires a reargument, and the petition must, therefore, be denied.
The rule on this subject, long since established, was stated by Chief Justice Taney at the December Term, 1852, in these words:
“ No reargument will be granted in any case unless a member of the court who concurred in the judgment desires it, and when that is the case it will be ordered without waiting for the application of counsel.'’
The grounds of this rule were fully explained in that case, and need not be restated. *
W…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Wetmore v. KarrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- City of Manning v. German Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Brooks v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.