Arnold v. Hoffer
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
This appeal involves the interpretation of a restrictive covenant in a subdivision in which the parties own real property. The plaintiffs, James J. Arnold, Catherine A. Arnold and Covenant Construe*55tion, LLC (Covenant), appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant John W. Hoffer, trustee.1 The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly interpreted the restrictive covenant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts, gleaned from the pleadings and the evidence submitted by the parties in conjunction with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Little v. Yale UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Simone v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Demorais v. WisniowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Insurance Commissioner of Delaware v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of CanadaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Alligood v. LaSaracinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Kolodziej v. Durham Agricultural Fair Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006