Zieg Et Vir v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
This is an action in trespass by a husband and wife against the City of Pittsburgh for personal injuries sustained by the wife in a fall on an icy sidewalk. A jury returned verdicts for the appellees. The City has appealed from the lower court’s refusal of its motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial.
On February 22, 1941, about 2:30 p.m., Catherine Zieg, sixty-six years of age, intending to visit her sister who resided at 1245 Berry Street in the City of Pittsburgh, was walking on the northerly sidewalk of said street. The day was cold and windy, and snow…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Holbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Beebe v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Hulings v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Fritzky v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Miller v. Exeter BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Williams v. ShultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Hillelson v. RennerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.