Legal Opinion
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian v. Price
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 7, 2017No. 15-56547PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
In 2011, the Secretary of Health ánd Human Services (HHS) implicitly interpreted 42 U.S.C. § 1396(a)(30)(A) (§ 30(A)) to permit approval of a state Medicaid plan rate reduction where the Secretary had not considered evidence comparing beneficiaries’ access to medical services to that of t)ie general public. This appeal considers what deference we' owe the Secretary’s interpretation of the portion of § 30(A) requiring, that state plans provide for rates “sufficient to enlist enough providers so that care and services are available under the plan at least to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of N.Y.C., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Santa Rosa Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Kent, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sissom v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- (PS) Rogers v. NewsomeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital v. KentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018