(PS) Rogers v. Newsome
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, No. 2:21-cv-2180 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 GAVIN NEWSOME, Governor of California, Rob Bonta, Attorney General of 15 California, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Kim Edward Rogers is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred 19 to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 20 before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.