Legal Opinion

Burke v. Lewis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2005No. 20040500PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

¶ 1 In addressing this petition for extraordinary relief, we must determine whether a district court may, without express authorization by statute or rule, appropriately appoint counsel for an absent, nonindigent civil litigant. We conclude that, in this case, the district court operated within the bounds of its discretion when it ordered such an appointment. This conclusion is based upon our determination that a court’s inherent power to appoint counsel is not limited to situations involving indigency and our decision that, despite ethical concerns raised by the litigant’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. MayfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DOCTORS'COMPANY v. DrezgaUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sorensen v. BarbutoUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bohman Aggregates v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. C.B.S. v. J.S.D.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Ld III, LLC v. Bbrd, LcCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API