Legal Opinion

Hymas v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 17, 2018No. 18-831Published

1Opinion of the Court

3fn tbe Wniteb ~tates C!Court of jfeberal C!Claitns No.18-831C Filed: December 17, 2018 ******************* * * JAY HYMAS, d/b/a DOSMEN FARMS, * Plaintiff, * Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to * Dismiss; Subject Matter v. * Jurisdiction; In Forma Pauperis; UNITED STATES, • 28 u.s.c. § 1500 . • Defendant. • • * ****************** * Jay Hymas, d/b/a Dosmen Farms, Pro Se, Richland, Washington. Daniel K. Greene, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant. With him were Douglas Mickle, Assistant Director, Robert E. Kirschman, Jr.,…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API